Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Server naming conventions
From: "Stanclift, Michael" <michael.stanclift () ROCKHURST EDU>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:37:51 -0600
We also use the Saints or Jesuit convention. Our VMWare host servers are the boring ones (ESX1, ESX2, etc) ... occasionally we'll name something for what it actually does, but not often. Although we did name our Exchange storage array THBGNSTY after a sandwich sold at a department favorite. It's "The Big Nasty" with all the vowels removed. It is big, and nasty. Michael Stanclift | Network Analyst | Computer Services Rockhurst University | 1100 Rockhurst Road, Kansas City, MO 64110 Phone: 816.501.4231 | Fax: 816.501.4014 | http://help.rockhurst.edu<http://help.rockhurst.edu/> PHelp keep our campus green, think before you print! ÏRUCS will never ask you for your password! From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Greg Francis Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:29 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Server naming conventions We typically use either saints or jesuits. For the saints, we used what they were the patron saint of in selecting the name. Used to be fine with <50 servers. Now as we approach 200 servers, that's started to go away. We're not out of saints, just ones that are well known! For certain services, like our Citrix farm, we just use something like CITRIX-01, etc. Boring, but effective. Our log management data collector is LMAO. Greg Greg Francis Director, Central Computing and Network Support Services Gonzaga University francis () gonzaga edu<mailto:francis () gonzaga edu> 509-313-6896 On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Woodruff, Daniel wrote: --> What kinds of naming conventions do everyone follow when building new servers? Currently, our Windows hosts are named following the pattern 'its-w2ks#' or similar, where the # is the next in the sequence, and the names are published in DNS. What are the potential drawbacks or using a scheme like this? Do you think it is any better or worse from a security perspective than using something like 'its-oracle-1' which has the service right in the name? We're concerned about disclosing the purpose of the machine via its name, and are trying to get an idea of what other schools do for their machines. Thanks in advance. Dan Woodruff University IT Security and Policy University of Rochester
Current thread:
- Re: Server naming conventions, (continued)
- Re: Server naming conventions Matthew Gracie (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Kevin Kelly (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Russell Fulton (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Sauvigne, Craig M (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Parker, Ron (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Pete Hickey (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Greg Francis (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions John Kristoff (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Perloff, Jim (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Jones, Dan (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Stanclift, Michael (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Bruce Carter (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Ken Connelly (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Bob Kalal (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Cal Frye (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Bob Bayn (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Wayne Samardzich (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Julian Y. Koh (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Perloff, Jim (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Bob Bayn (Feb 10)
- Re: Server naming conventions Neil Gaede (Feb 10)
(Thread continues...)