Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Implementing a Public Key Infrastructure


From: Theresa M Rowe <rowe () OAKLAND EDU>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:13:58 -0500

Based on my read, this applies to banks and those covered by
the Federal Reserve system, members of the FDIC, members of
the National Credit Union Administration, and similar
institutions.  I can't see that this applies to higher ed;
did someone come to a different conclusion?
Theresa

---- Original message ----
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:18:08 -0500
From: "St Clair, Jim" <Jim.StClair () GT COM>
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Implementing a Public Key
Infrastructure
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU

If you fall under the purview of the FFIEC, you are
affected:
http://www.ffiec.gov/press/pr101205.htm

Article in US Banker:
http://www.us-banker.com/article.html?id=20051201JIHJ1EXA


James A.St.Clair, CISM
Sr. Manager
Global Public Sector
Grant Thornton LLP
(703) 637-3078 (office)
(703) 727-6332 (mobile)
(703) 837-4455 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Brukbacher [mailto:sab2 () UWM EDU]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:09 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: Implementing a Public Key Infrastructure

Jack,
"Starting in January 2007, the SEC has
mandated financial institutions doing online business with
customers
MUST have two-factor authentication in place. "

Im trying to verify this.  Is there a link you can point me
to that
states this?

How are they defining "financial institutions"?

--
Steve Brukbacher
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
Information Security Coordinator
UWM Computer Security Web Site
www.security.uwm.edu
Phone: 414.229.2224



jack suess wrote:
Internet2 has a number of PKI activities in place. Look
at
middleware.internet2.edu. Jim jokl of U.Va is heading up
the higher ed

PKI group (HEPKI). I2 is trying to help with some of the
issues
related
to CREN closing and higher ed PKI.

Also Educause has a program where you can get discounts
on trusted PKI

certs from different vendors, if you go through a 3rd
party this will
save $$. Steve worona <sworona () educause edu
<mailto:sworona () educause edu>> is the point of contact at
educause for
this.

Finally, last week I was at the net@edu conference. Both
Jim and Nick
Davis presented at a session there on their respective
PKI role out.
There slides may be up under the net@edu conference.

It was a very interesting discussion between U.VA, which
has developed

their own CA, and U.Wisc that went through a 3rd party,
geotrust, for
their implementation.

What struck me in this discussion was the importance of
understanding
what you want to accomplish with PKI and making sure it
fits your
plans.

On face value it appears more costly to go with a
commercial CA but if

you are only going to roll out certs to a small subset of
your
population then the costs may be quite comparable.
Wisconsin showed
that
for its initial rollout of a few thousand certs it would
have cost
more
to do this internally than to outsource it when you add
in the cost of

purchasing the CA and staffing. In addition, if key
escrow is critical

to your plans you should build that in and that may point
to a
commercial provider.

On the other hand, UVA, VT, and MIT and others have all
have done
their
own CA and found some use out of it. Again, the question
is what your
target application is and how broad the deployment will
be.

Finally, something that has not been mentioned often that
you should
keep in the back of your mind. Starting in January 2007,
the SEC has
mandated financial institutions doing online business
with customers
MUST have two-factor authentication in place. People are
still not
sure
what that will mean in terms of specific implementation
but it is
clear
you will see a surge in alternate authentication schemes
coming out
late
this year by different financial institutions.


jack suess

On Feb 14, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Ricardo Lafosse wrote:

I have recently invested an ample amount of time in
researching how
to
implement a Public Key Infrastructure.  I am interested
in knowing if

anyone has had prior experience employing this practice
and what
difficulties were encountered?



Thanks





Ricardo Lafosse

Systems Administrator

Enterprise Computing Services

Florida Atlantic University

rlafosse () fau edu <mailto:rlafosse () fau edu>
<mailto:l () fau edu>







--------------------------------------------------------


In accordance with applicable professional regulations,
please understand that, unless expressly stated otherwise,
any written advice contained in, forwarded with, or attached
to this e-mail is not intended or written by Grant Thornton
LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the
purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed under
the Internal Revenue Code.

--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information.  Any review, dissemination, copying,
printing or other use of this e-mail by persons or entities
other than the addressee is prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender
immediately and delete the material from any computer.
Theresa Rowe
Assistant Vice President
University Technology Services
www.oakland.edu/uts - the latest news from University Technology Services

Current thread: