Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work?
From: endrazine <endrazine () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:53:33 +0100
Chris Rohlf a écrit :
This sort of goes without saying. But what other known 'bypasses' are there for grsec or SElinux that don't require a kernel vulnerability? Im asking honestly, its been awhile since I've looked into this stuff.
Afaik, Pax, grsec etc do _never_ randomize Xorg. endrazine- _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Rodrigo Rubira Branco (BSDaemon) (Mar 01)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Steve Grubb (Mar 01)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Chris Rohlf (Mar 02)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? endrazine (Mar 03)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Chris Rohlf (Mar 03)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? endrazine (Mar 07)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Chris Rohlf (Mar 02)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Steve Grubb (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Rodrigo Rubira Branco (BSDaemon) (Mar 01)
- Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work? Rodrigo Rubira Branco (BSDaemon) (Mar 03)