Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: ICQ99 crash
From: tdoane () GDN NET (Timothy Doane)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 20:41:09 -0500
From Mirabis's Web Page:
Testing ICQ99a ICQ is currently testing the next version of its software, ICQ99a. When it is ready for public release we will announce it on the Web site. Until then we urge you to use the current ICQ98a version. Please download ICQ98a from an approved download site only (Download.com, Tucows, ZDNet and Jumbo). Software obtained from any other source may have been altered and could cause harm to your system. What do you expect from a BETA of a BETA? -Tim On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Joe Stewart wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:06:47 -0500, you wrote:I think you should be aware that ICQ99 is a BETA release. IT IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC. Do not report the bug to Bugtraq, but instead, do what you agreed to when downloading ICQ99, report it to ICQ so that they can fix the bug in the general release. That's the purpose of BETA.Ordinarily I'd say that's a good rule, but ICQ is an exception to the rule IMHO. Let's not kid ourselves, ICQ _is_ in widespread use by the general public. It's been in a perpetual beta stage since its release and there doesn't seem to be a commercial release in sight. This is not your average beta program. Security flaws and bugs in this program can affect millions of users, and I think that deserves to be addressed on Bugtraq. -Joe
Current thread:
- mSQL vulnerability., (continued)
- mSQL vulnerability. Christofer C. Bell (Feb 17)
- OT: Copyright on Security advisories Aviram Jenik (Feb 18)
- Re: OT: Copyright on Security advisories Doug Granzow (Feb 19)
- Re: mSQL vulnerability. John W. Temples (Feb 18)
- Debian GNU/Linux 2.0r5 released (fwd) Jamie Fifield (Feb 17)
- Regarding passwords in registry keys. Ash (Feb 19)
- Re: [proftpd-l] root compromise ? (fwd) Nic Bellamy (Feb 14)
- ICQ99 crash loser (Feb 14)
- Re: ICQ99 crash Eric J. Stevens (Feb 15)
- Re: ICQ99 crash Joe Stewart (Feb 16)
- Re: ICQ99 crash Timothy Doane (Feb 16)
- Website Pro v2.0 (NT) Configuration Issues Christian Antkow (Feb 16)
- [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Anthony C . Zboralski (Feb 17)
- [SECURITY] New versions of super fixes two buffer overflows joey () FINLANDIA INFODROM NORTH DE (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Vic Abell (Feb 18)
- Tetrix 1.13.16 is Vulnerable Steven Hodges (Feb 17)
- Re: Tetrix 1.13.16 is Vulnerable Pavel Machek (Feb 19)
- ADMsnmp SNMP Audit scanner root (Feb 17)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Gene Spafford (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Theo de Raadt (Feb 18)
- Re: [HERT] Advisory #002 Buffer overflow in lsof Gene Spafford (Feb 18)