Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Muffett's AuotHack
From: paw () rigel dartmouth edu (Pat Wilson)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 11:35:29 +22300919
Alec Muffett wrote > Thank's for the critique; I never said that it was a *wonderful* paper > - I just said that I was withdrawing it for the time being. > Dont recall you asking anyone else to withdraw it. You really can't get a cat back into a bag.
Amazingly enough, there are probably *legal* issues of publication involved here (it's a *conference* paper, and there are probably "first rights of publication" involved). Can we move on now? Pat Wilson paw () dartmouth edu
Current thread:
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack, (continued)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Karl Strickland (May 22)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Jas (May 22)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Dave Horsfall (May 22)
- Muffett's AuotHack Alec Muffett (May 23)
- Re: Muffett's AuTOHack + [8lgm] sendmail advisory Neil Woods (May 23)
- /usr/lib/utmp_update musings Paul Ashton (May 23)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Karl Strickland (May 23)
- Muffett's AuotHack Scott D. Yelich (May 22)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Tim Scanlon (May 23)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack andy () btc uwe ac uk (May 23)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Pat Wilson (Dec 13)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Karl Strickland (May 23)
- Re: Muffett's AuotHack Tim Scanlon (May 23)