Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers
From: root () iifeak swan ac uk (System Administrator)
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 10:16:35 +0000 (GMT)
How about taking all of the source off the system and making the firewall boot over the inside net? Let's see 'em stop that one. Make the firewall diskless with all of its mounts off the inside net.
Ooh yummy an NFS target to play with 8). If you are using a Sun or sun derived system you need to be very very careful here, because Sun NFS as standard aint too fussy where the replies to its requests come from. (Convenient for multi-homed hosts). I suppose cranking up the Secure RPC NFS configuration is safe ? As to swap - use an OS that doesn't need a swap partition. You aren't exactly going to be running a lot on your firewall one hopes. Alan
Current thread:
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2, (continued)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Software Test Account (Mar 07)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Steve Robbins (Mar 10)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers F. L. Charles Seeger III (Mar 01)
- Re: snooper watchers der Mouse (Mar 01)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers der Mouse (Mar 01)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers whatever happened to my fighting fighting lightning lioness? (Mar 01)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers System Administrator (Mar 03)