Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3
From: rhaas () cygnus arc nasa gov (Robert M. Haas)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 20:59:05 -0800
CERN's httpd seems to be a bit smarter about this sort of thing, but it's SO huge that even if they have only 10% as many bugs per K, they're worse than NCSA. (NCSA's src/* is 195K; CERN's WWW/Daemon/Implementation is 610K, plus WWW/Library/Implementation's 1406K(!).)
Are there known bugs in CERN's httpd? Is there a buglist? If so I would appreciate a copy... I'm running CERN's httpd chroot'd, figuring that gives me a little room for error. Am I kidding myself? ...Robert
Current thread:
- Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Thomas Lopatic (Feb 13)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 13)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Christopher Davis (Feb 14)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Robert M. Haas (Feb 14)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Christopher Davis (Feb 16)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Christopher Davis (Feb 14)
- Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Thomas Lopatic (Feb 14)
- Re: Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 15)
- Re: Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Rens Troost (Feb 15)
- Re: Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 15)
- For NCSA Http_1.05a Everett F Batey WA6CRE (Feb 15)
- Sendmail 8.6.9 Nathan Lawson (Feb 14)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 Perry E. Metzger (Feb 14)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 Tom Fitzgerald (Feb 14)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 Perry E. Metzger (Feb 15)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 13)