Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Sendmail 8.6.9
From: fitz () wang com (Tom Fitzgerald)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 95 20:40:03 EST
There are massive holes in IDA that are fixed by 8.6.9; anyone telling you the reverse is tugging very hard on your lower appendages.
Could you be a little more specific - particularly concerning 5.67b+IDA1.5? There were definitely security bugs in 5.65c+IDA1.4.4.1, that were fixed with some emergency patches that were later merged in with 5.67, but I haven't heard of anything more recent. At the very least, are these problems that can be fixed by using smrsh? -- Tom Fitzgerald 1-508-967-5278 Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA fitz () wang com
Current thread:
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3, (continued)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Christopher Davis (Feb 14)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Robert M. Haas (Feb 14)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Christopher Davis (Feb 16)
- Re: Vulnerability in NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Christopher Davis (Feb 14)
- Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Thomas Lopatic (Feb 14)
- Re: Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 15)
- Re: Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Rens Troost (Feb 15)
- Re: Fixing the NCSA HTTPD 1.3 Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 15)
- For NCSA Http_1.05a Everett F Batey WA6CRE (Feb 15)
- Sendmail 8.6.9 Nathan Lawson (Feb 14)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 Perry E. Metzger (Feb 14)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 Tom Fitzgerald (Feb 14)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 Perry E. Metzger (Feb 15)