Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking
From: "Razi Shaban" <razishaban () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:32:19 +0400
Since it doesn't interfere with their phishing attempt: why would they remove any of the original content? However, a script that's supposed to detect a phishing attempt is a whole different matter.
A script that is supposed to detect a phishing attempt is the actual topic of this discussion. You come in here telling everyone they're doing everything wrong, and you don't even know what's being discussed? What? -- Razi
Current thread:
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking, (continued)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Umil (Sep 26)
- RE: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Matt Flynn (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 29)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 29)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 29)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ryan Greenier (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 30)