Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking

["Razi Shaban" <razishaban () gmail com>]

> Which, of course, is totally unreliable (and thus utterly pointless as a
> security measure), because you make way too much assumptions (client has
> JavaScript enabled, phisher doesn't check the used website for phone-
> home code, phisher uses the original website in the first place, ...).

So because it is not 100% reliable, we shouldn't use it?

I'm just trying to understand your state of mind.

--
Razi