Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: SSL VPN
From: "Ivan ." <ivanhec () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:27:13 +1100
one would assume that a clientless solution would require less management overhead This may help - VPN Decision Guide http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200232.pdf cheers Ivan On Jan 17, 2008 10:49 AM, Chad Loder <cloder () loder us> wrote:
On Tue Jan 15/2008 @ 8:01:P +0530 asdasd, Kartik wrote:Hi List, Currently we have 100+ home users who connect to our VPN gateway (IPSEC) and access the resources. As the business is growing, within a couple of months we'll be having more than 300 users operating from home. Management asked us to give them a "cost effective" solution to migrate the existing home users to "SSL VPN" so that there won't be any requirement of installing the software client etc (keeping in mind that the associates working from home will be growing) and it will be more secure.Can you explain, in more detail, the perceived need for the SSL VPN? If the only reason is "We don't want a software client", then there would be no reason to switch away from IPSEC since all major operating systems include a built-in IPSEC client.
Current thread:
- Re: SSL VPN, (continued)
- Re: SSL VPN Jason Thompson (Jan 15)
- RE: SSL VPN Alex (Jan 15)
- Re: SSL VPN Ivan . (Jan 16)
- Re: SSL VPN mgk.mailing (Jan 17)
- Re: SSL VPN Edy Lie (Jan 17)
- Re: SSL VPN Jason Thompson (Jan 15)
- Re: SSL VPN Andrea Gatta (Jan 15)
- Re: SSL VPN Kurt Buff (Jan 15)
- Re: SSL VPN Rodrigo Blanco (Jan 15)
- Re: SSL VPN Security (Jan 16)
- Re: SSL VPN Chad Loder (Jan 16)
- Re: SSL VPN Ivan . (Jan 17)
- Re: SSL VPN Chad Loder (Jan 17)
- Re: SSL VPN Bryan S. Sampsel (Jan 17)
- Re: SSL VPN Jurgen Vermeulen (Jan 18)
- Re: SSL VPN Patrick Beam (Jan 21)
- Re: SSL VPN c0unter14 (Jan 21)
- Re: SSL VPN Ivan . (Jan 17)