Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk?
From: "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:10:22 -0700
1) Cost 2) Stupid users and a litigious society - "I forgot my password, and now I can't get my pr0n - I'm gonna sue!" 3) Performance penalties vs. standard drives 4) Inability to predict and account for all uses. For the last, consider the complexity involved in making these work in, for instance, a home PC with RAID1 or RAID0 set up, not to mention a dedicated server in a business environment. I'm sure others will think of other issues. On 12 Sep 2007 16:16:55 -0000, dan () recyclepcs com <dan () recyclepcs com> wrote:
This would seem to be a security no brainer. What are its limitations?
Current thread:
- Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? dan (Sep 12)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? gjgowey (Sep 12)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Kurt Buff (Sep 12)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? James Fryman (Sep 13)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Nick Owen (Sep 14)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Daniel Anderson (Sep 18)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Michael Painter (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Craig Wright (Sep 13)
- Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? zenmasterbob123 (Sep 13)
- Re: Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? empfour (Sep 18)
- Re: Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Daniel Anderson (Sep 19)
- Re: Re: Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? empfour (Sep 20)
(Thread continues...)