Re: Remote Control to a remote computer with no listen port

[mickael kael <mickael.kael () gmail com>]

Hello,

I was not talking about port knocking, but my question was not very
clear, i'm sorry.

Here is the architecture

PC to remote control -- NAT/FW--Internet -- NAT/FW --Me
(info : NAT with no BIMAP and no port redirect)

Yes i see finaly that UltraVNC permit to install a relayer, or a NAT2NAT system.

But i decide to make VPN with openvpn.

PC to remote control with openvpn(MS or Linux) -- NAT/FW-- OpenVPN
Server on a Virtual Private Server -- NAT/FW -- Me with OpenVPN or
ssltunnel

And on the endpoint just simply use RDP or Ultra VNC on my virtual network

Thanks a lot for all your answers,

Best regards,

Mk,

On 11/21/05, John Maher <john.e.maher () gmail com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If I understand you correctly, then you might want to consider port
> knocking.  A Google search for "port knocking" will provide you with
> plenty of information.
>
> John
>
> mickael kael wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm searching a tool of remote control wich support no listen port on
> > the remote computer. That mean that the remote computer must open
> > connection to a server which permit connection to him.
> >
> > client to control ---(VPN over https)---> server (java applet)
> > <---(https)-- client
> >
> > Any idea or documentation to implement that ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Mk
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDgh59uY7WcSII22oRAu1bAJ94SYlMe3oVsKtYonnxWIF3OGHBgQCgw2oB
> 85sseqh/XGIrXnvC+9iCpcM=
> =3FHG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----