Security Basics mailing list archives
most that can happan (was Re: Why Security testing is required
From: "Meritt James" <meritt_james () bah com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:26:14 -0500
That is not the most something can do. I recommend that you update your business continuity plan while considering some of the worse things that can happen (it may, for instance, corrupt existing databases or open your business for intrusion - both of which are worse than simply dying) Jim Rishi Pande wrote:
I think the greater reason for security is not what is going to happen to your software(at most it may crash),
-- James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA Booz | Allen | Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Why Security testing is required Matt Lyon (Feb 20)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Meritt James (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Rishi Pande (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required steve (Feb 24)
- most that can happan (was Re: Why Security testing is required Meritt James (Feb 25)
- RE: Why Security testing is required David Gillett (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Byron Sonne (Feb 24)
- Re: Why Security testing is required captgoodnight (Feb 24)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Navaneetharangan (Feb 26)
- Re: Why Security testing is required Meritt James (Feb 26)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Navaneetharangan (Feb 26)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Raoul Armfield (Feb 24)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Steve (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why Security testing is required Fralick, Alan (Feb 25)
- RE: Why Security testing is required Ryan Cornelsen (Feb 27)