Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Any good method to check network overload?


From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:26:46 -0800

  I use MRTG for the boxes I have working/usable SNMP
implementations on.

  It doesn't handle outages/crashes very well.  it just
treats the last successfully retrieved data volume as
continuing until new data becomes available.
  There are some boxes I need to monitor, on which SNMP
is broken or unavailable.
  I'm not sure whether it would meet the original
poster's need, or not.

David Gillett


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Berry [mailto:compjma () hotmail com]
Sent: March 5, 2003 15:44
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Any good method to check network overload?


From: swin <swin () student dlut edu cn>
David Wrote:
This suggests that if ping times are consistently more 
than some value,
or are timing out, then the network is probably overloaded.  (Pings
will also time out if the router is down, but you probably 
want to alert
for that, too.  If you need to distinguish between the two 
cases, compare
pings OF the router with pings THROUGH the router.)

  What we want is an reliable way to check overload ,and we 
especially
accentuate it should be reliable,this method sounds a lttle 
rough,indeed
it can check if system is overload,but is it very reliable 
for automatic
check?and we hope to install the check program on the server 
or router 
itself,if so ,is it different?

  Thanks for you suggestion!

  swin. wang

Maybe I'm missing something, but what's wrong with using MRTG?

http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/

I mean, why reinvent the wheel?

Chris Berry
compjma () hotmail com
Systems Administrator
JM Associates

"Linux and I have a love/hate relationship.  I hate its 
complexity until I 
figure out how something works, then I love its power."

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



Current thread: