Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere
From: Chris Travers <chris () travelamericas com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 19:51:25 -0800
David M. Fetter wrote:
Neither telnet or pcanywhere are vpn solutions at all. They are remote access tools. However, if you are allowing telnet in from over the internet you are already in bad shape. Telnet sends all it's traffic including passwords in clear text. PCanywhere used to only send via clear text, but lately I believe they have an option to use encryption, however this solution is still not the best. Your best solution would be to setup a real VPN perhaps using freeswan with iptables on a linux system on each end. That would provide you with what you want along with encrypted traffic.
One should note that it is unlikely that you would want to use a Kerberized encryption in Telnet over the internet. SSH is a better option in this case, and without using Kerberos for this matter.
Current thread:
- Telnet vs PcAnywhere Tony Lindsey (Mar 07)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Igor D. Spivak (Mar 07)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Andreas Happe (Mar 08)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Chris Travers (Mar 10)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere a.berreby (Mar 10)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Sean Knox (Mar 07)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere John O'Connor (Mar 07)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere David M. Fetter (Mar 08)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Chris Travers (Mar 10)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Ron and Lisa Mehring (Mar 11)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Charley Hamilton (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Depp, Dennis M. (Mar 07)
- RE: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Michael Parker (Mar 10)
- Re: Telnet vs PcAnywhere Igor D. Spivak (Mar 07)