Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: nmap status question
From: gminick <gminick () bsd sim pl>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:48:55 +0200
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 06:03:26PM -0000, marc brown wrote:
i am new to linux but after getting my rh9 box running i have started to use nmap to do some scanning of my networks. can someone tell me exactly what it means when the state of a particular port is 'filtered'?
Ugly RTFM, really... The result of running nmap is usually a list of interest- ing ports on the machine(s) being scanned (if any). Nmap always gives the port's "well known" service name (if any), number, state, and protocol. The state is either 'open', 'filtered', or 'unfiltered'. Open means that the target machine will accept() connections on that port. Filtered means that a firewall, filter, or other network obstacle is covering the port and preventing nmap from determining whether the port is open. Unfiltered means that the port is known by nmap to be closed and no fire- wall/filter seems to be interfering with nmap's attempts to determine this. Unfiltered ports are the common case and are only shown when most of the scanned ports are in the filtered state. Isn't it clear? -- [ Wojtek Walczak - gminick (at) underground.org.pl ] [ <http://underground.org.pl/gminick/> ] [ "...rozmaite zwroty, matowe od patyny dawnosci." ] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- nmap status question marc brown (Jul 28)
- RE: nmap status question Thomas Ng (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Joshua J . Kugler (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question David (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question gminick (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Pete Hunt (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Birl (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Terry A. Durrant (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question Shaun Moore (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: nmap status question john mathew (Jul 29)
- RE: nmap status question Brad Bemis (Jul 29)
- Re: nmap status question David Vertie (Jul 29)