Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Network scanning
From: "CHRIS GRABENSTEIN" <LFGRABC () LF VCCS EDU>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:22:52 -0400
That is true. If that's the case though, he should really consider investing in a locking cabinet. They don't take up that much room. Of course there are situations it won't be practical, but I think it can be managed in most. Is there any reason to give everyone access to the switch? |-----Original Message----- |From: Sebastian Schneider [mailto:ses () straightliners de] |Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:10 PM |To: CHRIS GRABENSTEIN; security-basics () securityfocus com |Subject: Re: Network scanning | | |On Friday 08 August 2003 14:19, CHRIS GRABENSTEIN wrote: | |> As far as the hard wires, I think the best solution is to |search out those |> unused ports and unplug them from the switch. They can be quickly |> reconnected if needed, and you'll know about it. | |I guess you're actually aware, that not everyone is locking up rooms |containing switches. |And just plugging out unused cables won't be sufficient, since usually |I just can plug out any computer and plug in my own. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Network scanning, (continued)
- RE: Network scanning CHRIS GRABENSTEIN (Aug 08)
- Re: Network scanning Sebastian Schneider (Aug 08)
- Re: Network scanning White-Tiger (Aug 11)
- Re: Network scanning Sebastian Schneider (Aug 11)
- RE: Network scanning Ethan (Aug 12)
- Re: Network scanning Jeff Lumley (Aug 12)
- Re: Network scanning Sebastian Schneider (Aug 08)
- RE: Network scanning CHRIS GRABENSTEIN (Aug 08)
- Re: Network scanning Sebastian Schneider (Aug 11)
- Re: Network scanning Logan Rogers-Follis (Aug 14)