Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Reassembly of split fragments
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:00:52 -0800
On Jan 26, 2022, at 1:54 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl> wrote:
Few remarks. The mix-27010 dissector is made to dissect frames of type WTAP_ENCAP_MUX27010, or PCAP link layer header type, as defined at https://tcpdump.org/linktypes/LINKTYPE_MUX27010.html There it states what the layout in the PCAP packets ought to be. All your variations do not fall into that category, so shouldn't use this PCAP link layer header type, IMHO.
Exactly. If traffic doesn't match the description in the entry on the page at https://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html for the link-layer type being used in pcap or pcapng files for that traffic, the pcap/pcapng file isn't valid, and one shouldn't expect tcpdump or Wireshark or... to be able to handle it. I.e., if
[somebody captures] the serial line traffic in pcap format
then, if they want it to be interpreted as mux27010 traffic, they must encapsulate the serial line traffic in the form described on https://tcpdump.org/linktypes/LINKTYPE_MUX27010.html *before* they write it to the file. If that means that reassembly must be done before writing to the file, that's the way it is. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Reassembly of split fragments Lars Poeschel (Jan 26)
- Re: Reassembly of split fragments Jaap Keuter (Jan 26)
- Re: Reassembly of split fragments Guy Harris (Jan 27)
- Re: Reassembly of split fragments Tomasz Moń (Jan 27)
- Re: Reassembly of split fragments Jaap Keuter (Jan 26)