Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Status label for issues
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:06:18 +0200
It wasn't clear to me, that your list was the original list + new entries. I have especially an issue with the new ws-status labels and their transitions. Judging from a company, where we have about 50 developers whose daily bread it is to transition properly in Jira, I cannot see an open-source project with no additional tooling to properly transition between e.g. unconfirmed => confirmed => in-progress. That is my main concern. Am Di., 27. Apr. 2021 um 08:44 Uhr schrieb Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu
:
Diff between current and proposal list: - incident - question - cli::tshark + ui::tshark - ui::gtk - version::0.x - version::1.0 - version::1.10 - version::1.12 - version::1.2 - version::1.4 - version::1.6 - version::1.8 - version::2.0 - version::2.2 - version::2.4 - version::2.6 - version::3.0 + version::outdated + ws-status::unconfirmed + ws-status::confirmed + ws-status::waiting-for-response + ws-status::in-progress + ws-status::invalid + ws-status::wontfix + ws-status::fixed + ws-status::duplicate I have no strong feelings about the os::* labels. We can reduce them to os::mac, os::windows, os::linux, os::unix. Am 26.04.21 um 23:13 schrieb Roland Knall:The list seems to be duplicated with the lists from above. Anyhow, itseems we just have too many labels already, and Iam still not convinced that they can be used properly and consistentlyat this pointI would clean up the proposal list first, then from there figure outwhich items we need on the listcheers Roladn___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Status label for issues, (continued)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Graham Bloice (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Pascal Quantin (Apr 23)
- Re: Status label for issues Jirka Novak (Apr 24)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Eugène Adell (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)
- Re: Status label for issues Roland Knall (Apr 26)
- Re: Status label for issues Uli Heilmeier (Apr 27)