Re: Status label for issues

[Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>]

The list seems to be duplicated with the lists from above. Anyhow, it seems
we just have too many labels already, and I am still not convinced that
they can be used properly and consistently at this point

I would clean up the proposal list first, then from there figure out which
items we need on the list

cheers
Roladn

Am Mo., 26. Apr. 2021 um 21:17 Uhr schrieb Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu
> :

> Am 26.04.21 um 11:49 schrieb Roland Knall:
> > I suggest we create a wiki page for that discussion first, and if we can
> figure that out create the labels.
> >
>
> I've created
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/wikis/Discussion-Issues-Labels
> to discuss labels for issues.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe