Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: asn2wrs.py no longer seems to generate the same code ...


From: João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 05:08:36 +0100



On 15/05/20 23:46, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl> wrote:
The "asn1" target rebuilds all asn1 dissectors.
Alternatively to rebuild a specific one, use a target such as "generate_dissector-pkcs1".
Sure, but there seems to be multiple issues.

1. The 'documented' command placed in the generated source does not
generate the same source:

The reason for this difference is the dependency of pkcs1 on x509af-exp.cnf. Because of that invoking asn2wrs manually is unlikely to work.

If you use a verbose build (make VERBOSE=1 generate_dissector-pkcs1) you'll see the command being used is the same, except cmake uses absolute paths.

2. make asn1 modifies the source directory, but it seems to me that it
should not do that because that breaks one of the out-of-tree
guarantees that cmake gives you.

Example:

     mkdir build
     cd build
     cmake ..
     cmake --build . --target generate_dissector-pkcs1

Or if you use ninja:

     mkdir build
     cd build
     cmake -GNinja ..
     ninja generate_dissector-pkcs1

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: