Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes


From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:45:35 +0000



-----Original Message-----
From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Stephen Donnelly
Sent: den 15 mars 2018 05:46
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 2.6 branch planning and post-branch changes

On Mar 14, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:

As discussed previously we'll drop support for Qt 4 and GTK+ in the 
master branch after master-2.6 is created. Unless there are strong 
objections I'd like to bump the minimum GLib version to 2.32.

As a note, Redhat Enterprise Linux 6 is in Maintenance 2 support until late 2020, and only ships Glib 2.28 afaik.

Would this mean no Wireshark 2.6 support for EL6 based Linux distributions?

If I understand correctly 2.6 will still have GTK Qt4 and older Glib, the removal will take place in master(2.7) which 
probably will become 3.0 at release.

If EL6 support is still desirable, an option might be developing to the Glib 2.32 interface, but providing wrappers 
(polyfil) for the few bits of Glib used by Wireshark that are different or not available in 2.28.

Stephen

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: