Re: TRANSUM Performance Improvements

[Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com>]

Thanks Graham.  I didn’t realise that was possible.

From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org> On Behalf Of Graham Bloice
Sent: 23 March 2018 14:23
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] TRANSUM Performance Improvements



On 23 March 2018 at 13:38, Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com<mailto:Paul.Offord () advance7 com>> wrote:
I guess you’d class it as a bug fix as it stops WS taking ages to open certain files when TRANSUM is enabled.

A non-core dev might be able to propose it, in Gerrit can you see the  "Cherry-Pick" button?  If so, click it and then 
in "Cherry Pick to Branch:" start typing "mas" and chose master-2.4 from the autocomplete list.  Leave everything else 
alone and click the "Cherry Pick Change" button.


From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org>> On Behalf 
Of Graham Bloice
Sent: 23 March 2018 12:46
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-dev () wireshark org>>
Cc: Jonathan Whiteside <Jonathan.Whiteside () advance7 com<mailto:Jonathan.Whiteside () advance7 com>>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] TRANSUM Performance Improvements



On 23 March 2018 at 12:24, Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com<mailto:Paul.Offord () advance7 com>> wrote:
Hi,

My colleague Jonathan has been looking at the performance of TRANSUM.  He’s found that master has the performance 
improvements defined here https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24506/ but 2.4.5 doesn’t.  The 24506 change was merged 
into master back in November.  When will it appear in a Stable Release?

Thanks and regards…Paul


The release policy is here: https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/ReleasePolicy

This is in a bit of a grey area, is it a bug fix, or a new or changed feature?

We have merged things into stable that *I* consider new stuff, but it's basically down to the core developers involved.

As 2.6 is imminent, it's all rather moot.

--
Graham Bloice



--
Graham Bloice

______________________________________________________________________

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named 
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if 
you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Advance Seven 
Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept 
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

Advance Seven Ltd. Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour House, Coopers End Lane, Stansted, Essex 
CM24 1SJ

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe