Wireshark mailing list archives
Unit tests for dissectors
From: Atli Guðmundsson <atli () tern is>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:30:28 +0000
Hi, I've recently created reviews for: - an update of the ASTERIX dissector to support Category 019 - unit tests of the Category 019 support - generic unit test dissection validator (used by the above unit tests) I will soon add support for Category 020 and would like to know if I'm on the right track with the unit tests approach so that I can add on top of this or if I should go another way? This is because during my development I could only find a small set of unit tests for existing dissectors, but no extensive ones. I was thus also wondering if there was a particular reason for this? Or if I just overlooked something? The reviews that I created are: - https://code.wireshark.org/review/31081 - https://code.wireshark.org/review/31082 - https://code.wireshark.org/review/31083 - https://code.wireshark.org/review/31084 - https://code.wireshark.org/review/31085 Thank you in advance for your attention. Atli Guðmundsson *Software EngineerTel +354 424 5500* [image: Tern Systems] <https://www.tern.is/>
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Unit tests for dissectors Atli Guðmundsson (Dec 17)
- Re: Unit tests for dissectors Peter Wu (Dec 19)