Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: RPM generation
From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:57:02 +0000
Hi, Building the RPMs works for me now - Thanks Dario!!! Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Peter Wu Sent: den 16 april 2018 10:22 To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RPM generation On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:02:18AM +0200, Dario Lombardo wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman58 () gmail com> wrote:I followed the way I do it on Windows, which I think is the recommended way there :-)The cmake instructions I found always suggest to have the build dir under the source. For instance the openSUSE %cmake macro is an alias for "cmake .. (plus options)"
Which instructions? I looked for "cmake -" in the source tree, and all documentation in docbook/ suggest a build dir next to the source dir. The only example that creates a build dir in the source tree is the Gitlab CI configuration. The general recommendation is to do an out-of-tree build (where the build directory is not equal to the source tree). This could either be in-tree (mkdir build && cd build) or in a different location (mkdir /tmp/build && cd /tmp/build). Personally I use both approaches: my main development has a source tree symlinked at /tmp/wireshark and a build directory at /tmp/wsbuild. When building from a temporary git worktree, I usually create a build directory within this tree for convenience: # Run from source directory, create a new source directory which # shares the same git repository: git worktree add /tmp/wireshark-2.4 master-2.4 cd /tmp/wireshark-2.4 # update master-2.4 branch git pull mkdir build && cd build && cmake -GNinja .. (other options here) # when done, go back to original source tree and wipe temp dir cd /tmp/wireshark rm -r /tmp/wireshark-2.4 git worktree prune -v -- Kind regards, Peter Wu https://lekensteyn.nl ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: RPM generation, (continued)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 13)
- Re: RPM generation Anders Broman (Apr 13)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 14)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 14)
- Re: RPM generation Anders Broman (Apr 15)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 14)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 15)
- Re: RPM generation Anders Broman (Apr 15)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 16)
- Re: RPM generation Peter Wu (Apr 16)
- Re: RPM generation Anders Broman (Apr 16)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 16)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 16)
- Re: RPM generation Peter Wu (Apr 16)
- Re: RPM generation Dario Lombardo (Apr 16)