Re: Tshark: proto_tree not created on first pass with tap defined

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:02 AM, Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com> wrote:

> There definitely is a performance impact when you generate the protocol tree in the first pass, probably 33% longer 
> to load.
>
> Anyway, I have a 23-hour plane journey tomorrow so I'll have a crack at rewriting as a TAP.

Rewriting it as a tap won't help with that performance impact, unless part of the rewriting involves getting the 
information for TRANSUM in some other way than extracting particular fields from the protocol tree.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe