Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: checklicenses.py
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:20:18 -0700
On Aug 8, 2016, at 7:04 PM, João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote:
See this for a practical concern about the GDFL: https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
If Debian concluded that "GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free", then the GFDL would be OK only if we make sure there are no "unmodifiable sections". I'm not sure how much effort it would be to do that. Given that we've already released the User's and Developer's guide under GPLv2-or-later, we might as well use GPLv2-or-later for the man pages, saving ourselves that effort (and the effort of finding out how much effort it would be...), however much that effort might be. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: checklicenses.py, (continued)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py Guy Harris (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py Michael Mann (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 06)
- Re: checklicenses.py João Valverde (Aug 05)