Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003...
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:59:01 +0100
2015-11-19 21:05 GMT+01:00 Noel, Andre (6024395) <andre.noel () bell ca>:
Hello Pascal, I did try Legacy but I have the same message..
I did a quick test on an old Windows XP box: - a Wireshark development version generated with NMake runs on Windows XP (GTK UI, Qt one triggers the error as expected) - a Wireshark development version generated with CMake does not run on Windows XP => CMake (used to generate the official installers) does not add the compatibility flags allowing to target those old Windows. Windows XP is officially no more supported. We could modify the installer to also check for Windows 2003 Server. Pascal.
Regards. *From:* wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Pascal Quantin *Sent:* Thursday, November 19, 2015 3:02 PM *To:* Community support list for Wireshark *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Le 19 nov. 2015 8:51 PM, "Noel, Andre (6024395)" <andre.noel () bell ca> a écrit :Hello All, Just want to know if it’s only me or anyone else is having an issuerunning Wireshark 2.0 on windows 2003 server. Where windows is complaining the app is nota valid win32 application… I did not find a bug opened so far, so ifthere’s not I will open one. Just wanted to make sure it’s not a server issue on my side.Hi André, According to http://www.tripleboot.org/?p=423 Qt framework does not support Windows 2003 by default. I'm not sure whether we will continue supporting it or not (Windows XP support was officially dropped with Wireshark 1.10; we will need to discuss this) but you can launch the GTK based GUI (named Wireshark Legacy): this one should hopefully still run. Best regards, Pascal. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Pascal Quantin (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Pascal Quantin (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Guy Harris (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Guy Harris (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Guy Harris (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Pascal Quantin (Nov 19)