Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003...
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:02:22 -0800
On Nov 19, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Noel, Andre (6024395) <andre.noel () bell ca> wrote:
Just want to know if it’s only me or anyone else is having an issue running Wireshark 2.0 on windows 2003 server. Where windows is complaining the app is not a valid win32 application…
Is this a 32-bit or 64-bit version of Windows Server 2003? If it's a 32-bit version, did you download the 32-bit or 64-bit version of Wireshark? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Pascal Quantin (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Pascal Quantin (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Guy Harris (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Guy Harris (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Guy Harris (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Noel, Andre (6024395) (Nov 19)
- Re: Wireshark 2.0 vs Windows Server 2003... Pascal Quantin (Nov 19)