Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Removing ADNS
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 19:46:24 +0200
Hi, If anything we could consider adding unbound(*) instead. Thanks, Jaap (*) Bug 4018 <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4018> [PATCH] libunbound integration for async DNS resolution
On 01 May 2015, at 12:41, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:Does anyone link Wireshark with GNU ADNS? If not I'd like to drop support for it in master. The current version (1.5.0) switched licenses from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ and prior versions don't support IPv6.IIRC c-ares has been the preferred lib for doing this for a long time now, so I don't mind killing off adns completely. Less #ifdef stuff in the source as well :-) +1 Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Removing ADNS Joerg Mayer (May 01)
- Re: Removing ADNS Jaap Keuter (May 01)