Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: About window scale option
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:10:25 -0500
On 10/30/14 17:40, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Hmm, I don't do much with TCP (from a protocol perspective) but that certainly makes sense. And, in fact, it appears that the TCP dissector *wants* to act that way, based on the comments in the code:/* This is called for SYN and SYN+ACK packets and the purpose is to verify * that we have seen window scaling in both directions. * If we can't find window scaling being set in both directions * that means it was present in the SYN but not in the SYN+ACK * (or the SYN was missing) and then we disable the window scaling * for this tcp session. */It would be good if someone can open a bug report (attaching this already-public capture file) so this isn't forgotten.
Oh, I just noticed there's already a bug open for it: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10514 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: About window scale option Jeff Morriss (Nov 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- About window scale option 徐鸿 (Nov 13)
- Re: About window scale option Graham Bloice (Nov 13)
- Re: About window scale option Jeff Morriss (Nov 13)