Re: The possibility of a curses based Wireshark

[Stephen Fisher <sfisher () SDF ORG>]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:46:08AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:

> I don't think completely eliminating GLib is a project for 2.0 (or 
> whatever the version number of the Qt-as-the-default Wireshark will 
> be).
>
> That might happen in the future, but that means changing a lot more of 
> Wireshark to C++ code.  I don't have a problem with doing that, but I 
> do note, for what it's worth, that I can see the compile process 
> notably slow down once it hits the ui/qt directory. :-) 

Now that we've gone ahead and allowed C++ code into Wireshark after 
years of resistance:), will we always require the user to have a C++ 
compiler available?  That would simplify refactoring the code to call 
GTK vs. Qt vs. any other UI-toolkit code.  We could have a single 
main.cpp that displays common things like -h usage and -v version 
information and then call the UI-toolkit specific code as necessary.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe