Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:09:51 -0500
On 11/25/2014 06:09 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
I decided to stop building my local Wireshark with GTK3 support by adding --without-gtk3 (or --with-gtk3=no) assuming that this would still imply that I wanted it built with qt (--with-qt or --with-qt=yes), since they both default to yes, but the current logic in configure.ac doesn't account for disabling just one and I get this error: configure: error: Neither Qt nor GTK+ 2.12.0 or later are available, so Wireshark can't be compiled Does anyone see a problem with me changing configure.ac to default to --with-qt when --with-gtk3=no?
Well the default in master should be Qt=yes, Gtk3=yes. If you use --without-gtk3 (without other options) does that mean:
1) use gtk2 instead of gtk3 (failing if gtk2 is not found) 2) (or) try to use gtk2 if it's there 3) (or) don't use gtk at all? What about if you give --without-gtk2 (without other options)?That is to say, the current set of 3 options is kind of odd; I'm not sure there is a good way to do it. But I think it does beat having to first specify you want to use gtk (--with-gtk) and then specify which gtk to use (--with-gtk2) which would probably make it all clear (if painful to use).
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Stephen Fisher (Nov 25)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Alexis La Goutte (Nov 25)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Jeff Morriss (Nov 25)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Guy Harris (Nov 25)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Jeff Morriss (Nov 26)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Stephen Fisher (Nov 26)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Jeff Morriss (Nov 26)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Stephen Fisher (Nov 26)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Bálint Réczey (Nov 29)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Guy Harris (Nov 26)
- Re: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt Guy Harris (Nov 25)