Re: Can we move to Lua 5.2.3 only?

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

If 5.2 has been out for three years at this point it sounds fine to me.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hadriel Kaplan
<hadriel.kaplan () oracle com> wrote:
> Howdy,
> Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua 5.2?  Right now the automated builds are 
> getting built with 5.1.
>
> There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older scripts should continue to work)... but for the C-code it's 
> a lot more painful to have to continue to handle both Lua versions, and it takes longer to test, fix, etc.  There's 
> no real advantage to supporting both at this point, afaik.  There was back when Lua 5.2 was new and buggy, but 5.2 
> has been out since 2011.
>
> -hadriel
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe