Re: Using Wireshark for a DSL "link no surf" problem

[Kok-Yong Tan <ktan () realityartisans com>]

> On Jun 17, 2014, at 14:28, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl> wrote:
>
> > On 06/17/2014 08:42 PM, Kok-Yong Tan wrote:
> > Is it possible to use Wireshark to troubleshoot a DSL "link no surf" problem?  The ISP insists it's a CPE issue but 
> > the problem only started after their Tier 1 tech monkeyed with the DSLAM and/or the CPE (remotely) in some manner.  
> > I find it suspicious that the problem was intermittent packet loss until they tinkered, whereupon the problem became 
> > a "link no surf" issue (i.e., there's Layer 2 connectivity but zero Layer 3 traffic passing).
>
> Depends on what you can trace in the CPE, as in, how close to the DSL interface.
> Otherwise you'll need capture hardware on the DSL....
>
> Good luck,
> Jaap

I can get up to the DSL modem itself.  In hindsight, I'm thinking this isn't going to be of much use and the only way 
to debug this is with capture hardware on the DSL side as you suggested.  Drat.
--
Sent from my iPad2 with greater chance of typographical, grammatical and other disasters.  Your indulgence is even more 
humbly requested.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe