Re: Gerrit Drafts

[Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Evan,

> I was poking around gerrit a bit and I found an alternative way of handling
> WIP (work-in-progress) code. Apparently if you push to refs/drafts/BRANCH
> instead of refs/for/BRANCH (or alternatively pass -D to git-review) the
> review ends up in a special draft state that gerrit handles.
No problem to use refs/drafts/BRANCH but for the moment draft is only
see by author... (i think need to modify the Gerrit Configuration)
> Thoughts on using this instead of manual [WIP] tags? Openstack's wiki
> suggests not using it because it doesn't play well with their CI (test
> servers) but I don't know if that's an issue for us or not.
Will no be a problem for us (it is possible to choose the branch where
there is CI)
> Evan
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe