Re: Removal of reedsolomon code

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

Ah, the email in the source file was dead so I gave up, but that looks
like the same person, I will try contacting him.

Thanks,
Evan

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Didier <dgautheron () magic fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:15 -0500, Evan Huus wrote
> > As per my previous emails, the only questionably-licensed code we
> > have left is the reed-solomon implementation. It is used only in
> > packet-dcp-etsi.c.
> >
> > I have failed to find any other suitably-licensed reed-solomon
> > implementations, and don't have time to write one myself. As such I
> > think our best course of option is to remove the current code and
> > disable that feature in the DCP-ETSI dissector.
> >
> > I will submit a change to that effect shortly unless there are objections.
> Did you try to contact Phil Karn? This stuff seems to be in linux kernel and I
> doubt it's GPL1, moreover he has LGPL code at http://www.ka9q.net/
>
> Didier
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe