Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Removal of reedsolomon code
From: "Didier" <dgautheron () magic fr>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:53:55 +0100
Hi, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:15 -0500, Evan Huus wrote
As per my previous emails, the only questionably-licensed code we have left is the reed-solomon implementation. It is used only in packet-dcp-etsi.c. I have failed to find any other suitably-licensed reed-solomon implementations, and don't have time to write one myself. As such I think our best course of option is to remove the current code and disable that feature in the DCP-ETSI dissector. I will submit a change to that effect shortly unless there are objections.
Did you try to contact Phil Karn? This stuff seems to be in linux kernel and I doubt it's GPL1, moreover he has LGPL code at http://www.ka9q.net/ Didier ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Removal of reedsolomon code Evan Huus (Feb 11)
- Re: Removal of reedsolomon code Didier (Feb 11)
- Re: Removal of reedsolomon code Evan Huus (Feb 11)
- Re: Removal of reedsolomon code Alexis La Goutte (Feb 14)
- Re: Removal of reedsolomon code Evan Huus (Feb 14)
- Re: Removal of reedsolomon code Evan Huus (Feb 11)
- Re: Removal of reedsolomon code Didier (Feb 11)