Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec?

[Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>]

2014-08-25 16:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>:

> Oops, screen shot now attached ...
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Anders Broman
> <anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
> > From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
> > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
> > Sent: den 25 augusti 2014 00:06
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad
> > dissector additions conform to the spec?
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> >
> > I notice, as in the attached screen shot, that the 802.11ad dissector
> > additions label the field that the spec (available for free from
> > http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11ad-2012.pdf) calls
> the
> > Control Frame Extension simply as the Extension.
> >
> >
> >
> > While it could be considered obvious, I tend to believe that it should
> > conform fully to the spec.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> > Although no screen shot attached, I agree using the name from the spec is
> > the way to go.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/3916/

Regards,
Pascal.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe