Wireshark mailing list archives
Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec?
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:05:39 -0700
Hi folks, I notice, as in the attached screen shot, that the 802.11ad dissector additions label the field that the spec (available for free from http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11ad-2012.pdf) calls the Control Frame Extension simply as the Extension. While it could be considered obvious, I tend to believe that it should conform fully to the spec. Any thoughts? -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec? Richard Sharpe (Aug 24)
- Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec? Anders Broman (Aug 25)
- Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec? Richard Sharpe (Aug 25)
- Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec? Pascal Quantin (Aug 29)
- Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec? Richard Sharpe (Aug 25)
- Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec? Anders Broman (Aug 25)