Re: SET_ADDRESS, if-else

[Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>]

On 9/7/13 5:53 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> The usual trick in this situation is to wrap the macro in a "do { MY
> CODE } while (0)" so that it behaves syntactically like a normal
> function call. I have done this in r51819, so it should work now.

Is there any reason we shouldn't convert the macros in address.h (and
proto.h and packet.h and ...) to inline functions?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe