Re: SET_ADDRESS, if-else

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just found that
>
> if (...)
>    SET_ADDRESS(...);
> else
>    SET_ADDRESS(...);
>
> does not compile as this would expand to
>
> if (...)
> {
> };
> else
> {
> }
>
> and the compiler complains about else without if.
>
> Is there anything useful we could do about this other that putting
> another pair of brackets around the first SET_ADDRESS?

The usual trick in this situation is to wrap the macro in a "do { MY CODE }
while (0)" so that it behaves syntactically like a normal function call. I
have done this in r51819, so it should work now.

Cheers,
Evan

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe