Re: proto_field_is_referenced

[Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>]

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 02:23:54PM -0500, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
> I was leaning more towards useless because I can't think of a scenario where tree (is already) != NULL, yet a 
> dissector would be called without having its proto field referenced.

I don't understand this. For example 'frame.*', 'ip.*' is not referenced, still frame and ip dissector must be called 
because 'tcp.*' might be refereced. Could you elaborate?

Kuba.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe