Wireshark mailing list archives
proto_field_is_referenced
From: mmann78 () netscape net
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:23:54 -0500 (EST)
Is proto_field_is_references still a valid function? In looking at the intent, it either looks completely useless or should be used on almost all dissectors. I was leaning more towards useless because I can't think of a scenario where tree (is already) != NULL, yet a dissector would be called without having its proto field referenced.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- proto_field_is_referenced mmann78 (Nov 23)
- Re: proto_field_is_referenced Evan Huus (Nov 23)
- Re: proto_field_is_referenced Jakub Zawadzki (Nov 23)