Re: Merging wiretap pint macro to wsutil/pint.h

[Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>]

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:34:44PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
> I think using the number of bits is cleaner, but going that way everywhere, not just in those macros, *would* be a 
> major change (mechanical, but still a change).

I only want to make wtap-int.h use pint.h macros,
htons(), htonl(), htonll() is kinda easier to write and looks prettier for me than hton16, hton32, hton64().

But it's 2 against 1, so I will make suggested change. Thanks for opinion.

Cheers,
Kuba.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe