Wireshark mailing list archives
Building RPMs without building SRPMs?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:38:27 -0800
On Mar 5, 2013, at 1:35 PM, morriss () wireshark org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=48105 User: morriss Date: 2013/03/05 01:35 PM Log: Don't have a separate srpm-package target: we already build the SRPM while building the RPM (since r47574).
Is there a compelling reason to build both at once and not to allow building an RPM without building an SRPM? Ricardo PĂ©rez's problem wouldn't have occurred had he been able to build an RPM without building an SRPM, right? A *distribution* might want to build both, but if somebody's building an RPM so that people can install their customized version of Wireshark as a binary (and providing the source as a tarball to anybody who wants it), would allowing building just the RPM, not the SRPM, be OK? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Building RPMs without building SRPMs? Guy Harris (Mar 05)
- Re: Building RPMs without building SRPMs? Jeff Morriss (Mar 05)