Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: dlg_utils.c comment completely obsolete ??
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:34:49 -0800
On Mar 5, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com> wrote:
In dlg_utils.c: GtkWidget * dlg_window_new(const gchar *title) { ... /* * XXX - if we're running in the capture child process,
The "capture child process" is now dumpcap; the only reason why the capture child process would try to pop up a window would be if, on an exec failure, it tried reporting that by popping up a window rather than just sending stuff on the pipe to the parent, and it doesn't do that. So, yes, the comment is obsolete, given that...
* Perhaps the child process should only capture packets, write them to * a file, and somehow notify the parent process and let *it* do all * the GUI work. If we can do that efficiently (so that we don't drop * more packets), perhaps we can also do so even when we're *not* doing * an "Update list of packets in real time" capture. That'd let the * child process run set-UID on platforms where you need that in order * to capture, and might also simplify the job of having the GUI main * loop wait both for user input and packet arrival.
...we're now doing exactly that, complete with the "even when we're *not* doing an "Update list of packets in real time" capture" part. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- dlg_utils.c comment completely obsolete ?? Bill Meier (Mar 05)
- Re: dlg_utils.c comment completely obsolete ?? Guy Harris (Mar 05)