Re: tshark option for reassembled fragment output

[Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan () acmepacket com>]

On Mar 27, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

> That patch is a Very Good Thing. I know we discussed a few tweaks (for
> example it probably shouldn't imply -2?), but I think those and the
> actual flag used are bike-shedding at this point.
>
> I still want to pick some nits, but I'm more than happy to commit the
> current patch now so that at least there's *a* way to do it, even if
> it's not the best way.

OK I attached it to bug 8223.  I'm not claiming it's pretty though. :)


> > I'll try running it with the pcap attached to the bug above to see if it resolves that issue.
>
> I strongly suspect it will if I'm understanding all the relevant
> points, but verification would be nice.

Yup, it worked.

-hadriel

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe