Re: Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ?

[mmann78 () netscape net]

I believe I just missed committing that file when I added the FT_SYSTEM_ID type.  Committed (functionality) to rev 
54394 and thanks for the catch!



-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 12:44 pm
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ?


My gcc build is complaining that FT_SYSTEM_ID is missing from 3 switch statements.  I'm not sure I properly understand 
how it is used, so would appreciate if someone could take a quick look at this patch?  If there are no objections I 
will commit it later...


Thanks,
Martin


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

 

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe